Harms include both short-term and long-term or inter-generational harms (e.g. Mass public-health measures always involve a trade-off between expected benefits and known and potential risks or harms. PANDA’s comprehensive multidisciplinary review has found that mass Covid-19 vaccination has been a failed experiment. – Chris Bateman Policy review: Covid-19 vaccines The failed experiment This represents a ‘massive failure of regulatory oversight,’ and changes are needed to ensure it cannot happen again. There was insufficient justification for the emergency rollout to almost everyone. Covid vaccines should have been contra-indicated for the vast majority of people while the steps taken to mandate or coerce populations to be injected were ‘completely unjustifiable’ from a public-health and human rights viewpoint, suggesting a politically or profit-driven agenda. Those are among the conclusions Panda comes to in this ‘in-your-mainstream-science face’ policy review. Otherwise, it was a ‘failed experiment,’ with an overall net benefit-risk ratio that was ‘zero, limited and/or short-lived.’ The vaccine’s efficacy versus the risk of infection became negative after six months with an unknown longer-term safety profile. Yes, we might get hot (under the collar), but you burn people.’ The Covid vaccine should, at most, have been used carefully and with full informed consent in only the most vulnerable groups, based on the ‘solid evidence’ of the health benefits for each individual. In other words, “put this in your dominant, mainstream narrative vaping bong and smoke it. This could be termed a PANDA health harm reduction message.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |